<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bad Case of Iowa Envy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/</link>
	<description>Peace, Justice and Hockey</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15764</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15764</guid>
		<description>The reason turnout was so huge, T.A., may have had at least something to do with Bush fatigue.  You have yet to make a convincing case that Obama is a progressive in the true sense of the word.  His record and his stand on the issues indicates otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason turnout was so huge, T.A., may have had at least something to do with Bush fatigue.  You have yet to make a convincing case that Obama is a progressive in the true sense of the word.  His record and his stand on the issues indicates otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15753</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15753</guid>
		<description>Great analysis, Ben.

Any prognostications? I can't help but suspect the Clintons will do just about anything to get Hill elected. Will they kneecap Obama somehow?

It is interesting how your one sentence about Kucinich's PBS commentary makes you a Kucinich supporter. Isn't it funny how mainstream Dems are absolutely mortified of progressive candidates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis, Ben.</p>
<p>Any prognostications? I can&#8217;t help but suspect the Clintons will do just about anything to get Hill elected. Will they kneecap Obama somehow?</p>
<p>It is interesting how your one sentence about Kucinich&#8217;s PBS commentary makes you a Kucinich supporter. Isn&#8217;t it funny how mainstream Dems are absolutely mortified of progressive candidates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t.a. barnhart</title>
		<link>http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15742</link>
		<dc:creator>t.a. barnhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://morehockeylesswar.org/blog/archive/2008/01/05/a_bad_case_of_iowa_envy/#comment-15742</guid>
		<description>it's gotten sad how after 5 years, Kucinich supporters still think there's a big conspiracy to keep him out of debates and away from the top of the ballot.  in 2003, Howard Dean started about 2 miles behind Kucinch, got nothing but disdain and mockery from the media, hatred from the Beltway Dems -- and love from the 'roots.  Kucinich failed in the same effort, and yet somehow it's part of a conspiracy.  

of course there's a lot of manipulation that goes on.  it's politics.  you have to find ways to work past that.  Obama did it by tapping into the progressive grassroots desire for a better form of govt -- and once again, Kucinich failed to do the same.  the media did not give this to Obama.  ordinary Americans did it.  go ahead and mock him, but the reason turn-out in Iowa was so huge -- 80,000 more than 2004, and even Hillary got more votes than Huckabee -- is that Obama's message and person excite and inspire.  Kucinich? not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s gotten sad how after 5 years, Kucinich supporters still think there&#8217;s a big conspiracy to keep him out of debates and away from the top of the ballot.  in 2003, Howard Dean started about 2 miles behind Kucinch, got nothing but disdain and mockery from the media, hatred from the Beltway Dems &#8212; and love from the &#8216;roots.  Kucinich failed in the same effort, and yet somehow it&#8217;s part of a conspiracy.  </p>
<p>of course there&#8217;s a lot of manipulation that goes on.  it&#8217;s politics.  you have to find ways to work past that.  Obama did it by tapping into the progressive grassroots desire for a better form of govt &#8212; and once again, Kucinich failed to do the same.  the media did not give this to Obama.  ordinary Americans did it.  go ahead and mock him, but the reason turn-out in Iowa was so huge &#8212; 80,000 more than 2004, and even Hillary got more votes than Huckabee &#8212; is that Obama&#8217;s message and person excite and inspire.  Kucinich? not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
